Publications

Link to the list of the whole publications

Google Scholar Citations

ORCID

NIH My NCBI Collections

Selected Publications

Statistical Methods for Risk Prediction

  • Uno H, Cai T, Tian L, Wei LJ. Evaluating prediction rules for t-year survivors with censored regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2007;102(478):527-537.
  • Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, and Wei LJ. On the C-Statistics for Evaluating Overall Adequacy of Risk Prediction Procedures with Censored Survival Data. Statistics in Medicine. 2011;30(10):1105-116.
  • Uno H, Cai T, Tian L, Wei LJ. Graphical Procedures for Evaluating Overall and Subject-Specific Incremental Values from New Predictors with Censored Event Time Data. Biometrics. 2011;67(4):1389-96.
  • Uno H, Tian L, Cai T, Kohane IS, Wei LJ. A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2013; 32(14):2430-2442.

Note: Uno et al. (2011, StatMed) discusses a statistical inference procedure for concordance probability between the risk estimate and the outcome, which has been widely used as a performance measure of risk prediction models. There are several methods to handle censored survival data in estimating the concordance, but all have the significant limitation that those estimates depend on the underlying study-specific censoring distribution in the presence of general random censoring. Given that censoring time distribution is generally study-specific, methods without this limitation would represent a more widely applicable approach. This method has been employed in SAS/PHREG procedure (CONCORDANCE=UNO option) and has been called “Uno’s C” in some statistical literature. This paper was ranked in one of the 10 most cited Statistics in Medicine papers in Year ’12-’13.

Clinical Prediction Models

Below is the list of clinical prediction models that I have developed.

  • Kastrinos F, Uno H, Ukaegbu C, et al. Development and Validation of the PREMM5 Model for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Lynch Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 35(19):2165-72. PMC5493047

  • Uno H, Cronin MA, Wadleigh M, et al. Derivation and validation of the SEER-Medicare myelodysplastic syndromes risk score. Leukemia Research, 2014, 30;38(12):1420-24. PMC4314368

  • Hassett MJ, Uno H, Cronin AM, et al. Detecting Lung and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Using Structured Clinical/Administrative Data to Enable Outcomes Research and Population Health Management, Medical Care. 2017; 55(12):e88-e98. PMC4732933

  • Uno H, Ritzwoller DP, Cronin AM, et al. Determining the Time of Cancer Recurrence Using Claims or Electronic Medical Record Data. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2018; (2):1-10. PMC6338474

  • Yurgelun M, Uno H, Furniss C, Ukaegbu C, Horiguchi M, Yussuf A, LaDuca H, Chittenden A, Garber J, Syngal S. Development & validation of PREMMplus for hereditary cancer risk assessment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022; 40(35):4083-4094.

Alternatives to the conventional survival data analysis

Despite the issues of the hazard ratio (HR) estimate, the HR has been the first choice for many decades. The following papers discuss issues and concerns of the HR and importance of estimating clinically interpretable metric using robust statistical inference procedures.

  • Uno H, Claggett B, Tian L, et al. Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32(22):2380-2385.
  • Uno H, Wittes J, Fu H, et al. Alternatives to hazard ratios for comparing efficacy or safety of therapies in noninferiority studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2015, 163(2):127-34.
  • Uno H, Claggett B, Tian L, et al. Adding a new analytical procedure with clinical interpretation in the tool box of survival analysis. Annals of Oncology 2018. PMID: 29617717
  • Horiguchi M, Hassett MJ, Uno H. How do the accrual pattern and follow-up duration affect the hazard ratio estimate when the proportional hazards assumption is violated? The Oncologist. 2018;23:1-5.
  • Uno H, Horiguchi M, Hassett MJ. Statistical test/estimation methods used in contemporary phase III cancer randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes. The Oncologist 2020;25:91–93.
  • Uno H, Schrag D, Kim DH, Tang D, Tian L, Rugo HS, Wei LJ. Assessing Clinical Equivalence in Oncology Biosimilar Trials With Time-to-Event Outcomes. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019; 3(4):pkz058. doi:10.1093/jncics/pkz058.

Related to the above, we proposed novel statistical tests to compare survival time data between two groups in the followingpapers. These tests can capture various patterns of difference and can be good alternatives to the logrank test or tests based on the hazard ratio.

  • Uno H, Tian L, Claggett B, We LJ. A versatile test for equality of two survival functions based on weighted differences of Kaplan-Meier curves, Statistics in Medicine, 2015; 34(28):3680-95. doi:10.1002/sim.6591.
  • Horiguchi M, Cronin A, Takeuchi M, Uno H. A flexible and coherent test/estimation procedure based on restricted mean survival times for censored time-to-event data in randomized clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 2018;37(15):2307-2320. doi:10.1002/sim.7661.
  • Horiguchi M, Uno H. On permutation tests for comparing restricted mean survival time with small sample from randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine. 2020; doi:10.1002/sim.8565.
  • Uno H, Horiguchi. Ratio and Difference of Average Hazard with Survival Weight: New Measures to Quantify Survival Benefit of New Therapy. Statistics in Medicine. 2023; doi:10.1002/sim.9651.
  • Horiguchi M, Tian L, Uno H. On assessing survival benefit of immunotherapy using long-term restricted mean survival time. Statistics in Medicine. 2023; doi:10.1002/sim.9662.

Collaborative clinical research

  • Cripe LD, Uno H, Paiettta EP, Litzow MR, Ketterling RP, Bennett JM, Rowe JM, Lazarus HM, Luger S, Tallman MS. Zosquidar, a novel modulator of P-gp, does not improve the outcome of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG 3999). Blood. 2010; 116: 4077-85.
  • Solomon SD, Uno H, Lewis E, Eckardt KW, Burdmann EA, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Ivanovich P, Levey AS, Parfrey P, Remuzzi G, Singh AK, Toto R, Huang F, Rossert J, McMurray JV, Pfeffer MA for the TREAT Investigators. Erythropoietic response and outcomes in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010; 363 (12): 1146-55.
  • Skali H, Uno H, Levey AS, Stevens L, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Prognostic Assessment of Kidney Function by the new CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation vs. the MDRD study equation for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate. American Heart Journal. 2011;162(3):548-54.
  • McMurray JV, Uno H, Jarolim P, Desai AS, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt KU, Ivanovich P, Levey AS, Lewis EF, McGill JB, Parfrey P, Parving HH, Toto RM, Solomon SD, Pfeffer MA. Predictors of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and anaemia: an analysis of the Trial to Reduce cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT). American Heart Journal. 2011;62(4):748-755.
  • Kumar S, Uno H, Jacobus S, Wier SV, Ahmann G, Henderson K, Callander N, Haug J, Siegel D, Greipp P, Fonseca R, Rajkumar V. Impact of gene expression profiling-based risk stratification in patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Blood. 2011;118(16):4359-62.